📲
I'm often accused of being an "old soul", a categorization I vehemently dislike because it pretends as if my taste is because of nostalgia, as opposed to what is actually cool and compelling. (If something cool comes out now, I enjoy it, but we're in a down period when it comes to culture). But, something old about me, is that I do not care at all about TikTok ending, if does happen. If Elon takes it over from the Chinese, you might as well leave anyway, but I'm just worried at why this is a huge deal for people. It's just an app. Another one will be made. TikTok is not culture, it directly flattens culture into these ten second clips that take music, movies --- things that you need to process --- into something that is now consumed by everyone at a rapid pace, not allowing for the nuances, the style, the aesthetics to sit with us. I have never watched something on TikTok and thought that this is something in that pushing American culture to deeper heights. I am sorry. Now I am sure they're good stuff on the app, but it's not really a necessity. Whenever I hear the words "it's blowing up on TikTok", my mind immediately growls. I understood why X becoming overrun with Elon bots and right wingers is a big deal; X actually created things, made careers, made American life, and American events available to be seen by everyone. However, TikTok is a corrupt fantasy, chopping at the wires that make physical connection important. Read a book! Go to the movies! Go to the restaurant of a cuisine that is unheralded, go to a baseball game. Who cares about TikTok?
image
@jayson
STAFF
Jan 14, 2025

Comments (20)

Make an account to reply.
image
I don’t know. As much as I hate the app it’s built so much for so many communities and economically will ruin a lot of businesses and peoples lives.
Jan 15, 2025
image
The worst part about the tiktok ban is that it is based on a bill written and voted on by Congresspeople who have never understood anything about the app. I've read a variety of things about tiktok and what became clear is that if someone isn't a user they do not understand it. And that is what scares people. Here's this megapopular app used by young people that older generations have very few points of entry into. It's not Facebook or Instagram or Twitter where the olds can join and connect with people they know and comment "Amen" on pictures of shrimp Jesus. It is beyond their comprehension (our comprehension, really, I include myself) and beyond their control. So they banned it.
Jan 15, 2025
image
bee1000 that is not why, it was banned bc china will not sell it to a US company and divest from being a Chinese company that reports all of its user data to the Chinese governemnt. The US would rather have the user data and the loss of this surveillance opportunity & china's gained surveillance opportunity is unacceptable to them. That's why. It's not about any of these dreamy and vague reasons people are bringing up (no hate!). TikTok is choosing to withdraw support rather than divest from their parent company and move to the US
Jan 15, 2025
image
killer Oh I know all about why they say they’re banning it
Jan 15, 2025
image
you forget the community that tiktok creates, you wont find it anywhere else. it allows people to create interactive communities that are non existent on meta, x, or any big future united states based social media sites. the things these companies do is probably 10x worse than tiktok; they produce horrendous algorithms that literally listen to you through your phone. not to mention, the bigotry isnt even combatted on those apps. on the other hand tiktok has blessed my algorithm with a plethora of things i would, otherwise, have a hard time learning about. the media recommendations on there are also phenomenal; some of the best movies and songs i have came across were from tiktok.
Jan 15, 2025
image
soicyboy forgot to mention the literal infringement upon our rights!
Jan 15, 2025
image
soicyboy your algorithm was not blessed or mystical it was machine generated to keep you scrolling on the app seeing ads, responding entirely to the amount of time you spent on each video.
Jan 15, 2025
image
killer that might be the point of algorithms. if im going to waste time on an app id rather it not go to elon.
Jan 15, 2025
image
tiktok was a huge resource for me when i realized i was trans/nonbinary. it was during covid lockdowns when i desperately needed connection and to understand myself so it was something i dont take for granted. that said, i think less addictive algorithms pulling our attention from the real world is kind of a good thing. i do agree with the other comment here about the problem with the govt banning tech. and with net neutrality being at risk, many people wont even have access to get on the internet. more reasons to build and network IRL
Jan 14, 2025
image
you don't have to care about tiktok itself, but it IS important to care that the american government is banning websites at all, which is restricting our freedom of speech and moving us closer to a fascist state. this ban goes way deeper than the app itself. you don't have to like tiktok but you should still care what the ban stands for.
Jan 14, 2025
image
sbonifazi I totally agree. The people who benefit from this ban the most are not the average American because they will, in theory, spend less time scrolling (meta and google have already adopted TikTok’s algorithm ffs), it is the corporations that profit from lobbying against a competitor in their market— and the implications of being successful at that kind of lobbying are pretty bleak.
Jan 14, 2025
image
sbonifazi i feel like there can be a balance bc it’s a complicated situation - like i don’t really care about it personally in that i think it is a terrible app and is negatively impacting society, and i also understand the weight this precedent has on free speech rights and the internet. but i do think the majority of people “sad” about it going away are mostly sad bc they <3 to scroll it and not bc of the broader political implications it has. unfortunately Reels will probably take its place and with meta‘s new fact checking and hate speech policies (or lack thereof) i think meta’s platform will be cemented as an online leviathan worse than tiktok or twitter 😬
Jan 14, 2025
image
marxinista right it’s a terrible precedent to set on the one hand because the US government loves to use national security as a justification for overreact of power but on the other hand… TikTok and its consequences to society…
Jan 14, 2025
image
marxinista it really does seem like part of the tiktok ban is the fact that they don’t control the algorithm. Zuck’s new rules are already a hint at how quickly he’ll roll over that control.
Jan 14, 2025
image
algorithmic driven video scroll feed is destroying people's minds straight up
Jan 14, 2025
image
Even if it isn’t banned, it is to me.
Jan 14, 2025
image
on a similar train of thought: I’ve been leaving Instagram behind for similar reasons. Everything’s an ad, even people’s life, and everything is content. Only a minuscule part of the things that get posted feels genuine. Not to mention the bottomless pit of wasted time that gets spent on it with its addictive features. Im emotionally and spiritually exhausted from it.
Jan 14, 2025
image
reinitahp__ omg so true
Jan 14, 2025
image
literally, by now in 2025 most of the intelligent/cool people who made it really useful have left/branched out anyways whilst the actual app has devolved into a cesspool of consumerism and ignorance
Jan 14, 2025
image
Agreed 1000% lol
Jan 14, 2025

Related Recs

📵
So i recently I've deleted tiktok, again. I deleted in 2020 then re-download it 4 years later when a friend reminded me that I never actually got rid of my account. I hear a lot of people say "I want to delete but i cant cuz I learn so much!", or "I able see this niche thing I can't find anywhere else!". And that's fair to an extent but it's an algorithm. You didn't "find" anything. You enjoy being fed your slop instead of finding it yourself. I think this is fine! I found this amazing site through tiktok myself. I just hate when ppl complain about something that's supposedly causing them more harm then good, but still go back to said thing. If you really care about a topic, you WILL find an alternative way to consume that topic. For instance, I like saving recipes and tiktok can be good for that. However, tiktok also makes me want to kms so I will use Pinterest instead. Or I like watching lifestyle content so I'll go on YouTube instead. Obviously other platforms have their own issues but if you really wanted to leave the app, you would've but you don't because ur addicted to the slop and u hve fomo.
🖤
I, someone who grew up adjacent to a big city and have lived in that big city since, always thought of Hot Topic as a joke. What goth teenager is buying their black clothes and accessories at the mall, after all. I have since heard from people who didn’t grow up near big cities that Hot Topic was a place “weird” kids could feel more comfortable. It wasn’ta community in the sense of people doing anything collectively, but I don’t think people need to do anything to feel they’re part of something bigger than themselves and that they aren’t alone. I think a TikTok community is like an online Hot Topic. If someone is stuck somewhere feeling different from everyone else, seeing a video someone like them made in a bedroom like theirs is going to be meaningful. And once they watch one, For You is going to keep showing them more like it. It’s not like a community that might grow around a YouTuber or a streamer because it’s not based on one person. It’s based on an interest. It doesn’t fit a conventional sense of community, of course, but that’s just semantics. And since a billion people or something use tiktok there could be millions of these loose communities. Would everyone be happier and more fulfilled by gathering with people IRL? Of course. But that doesn’t mean an online community isn’t valuable. I love defending TikTok!
Jan 16, 2025
i had it for a little over a year until i was like wow this is actually terrible! i genuinely think it has negatively impacted society by ruining people’s attention spans, having a horrific algorithm, and most of all by the most mind-numbing or outright harmful trends - fake words that people now use IRL (“unalive”), trad wife tiktok, shein hauls, body-focused fitness vids that encourage fatphobia and unhealthy habits, shallow political/feminist theory and queer discourse, “alpha male” podcaster tiktok, encouraging overconsumption in general, trends ruining local spots or niche things… the list goes on
Aug 17, 2024

Top Recs from @jayson

🎥
There's something quite startling about Martin Scorsese's 1980's period compared to the rest of his decades as one of America's greatest filmmakers. In the 80's, he was weird, strange, and making weirdly manic films that feel more New York than even some of his movies about the mob. They're movies about characters who aren't glamarous people that they want to be, but rather, are losers who can't seem to correctly fucntion in normal society. They're non-violent sociopaths. I saw The King of Comedy at Metrograph recently, and it's exhilarating, hilarious, manic, and scary. With Jerry Lewis, Bobby De Niro and Sandra Bernhard, Scorsese was able to create a world where incels who are bad at comedy are wishing for fame. Sound familiar? This is a great movie. In 1983, it was a box office flop. But in 2025, it is magical in how it's telling the future. A future of scam artists who don't want to work to get there, and don't want to sit in their mediocrity: they want to steal to get their fifteen seconds. Go watch this masterpiece.
image
@jayson
STAFF
Jan 28, 2025
recommendation image
It's a perfect movie. It's almost too perfect. The fashion, the look on Cate's face when Theresa (Rooney Mara) is walking to her at the end, the line reading of "ask me things, please"; the fact that men are the joke throughout the movie. It makes me wonder about representation and the limits of it because of how womanly and queer this movie is, despite the fact that it never feels like a movie made for women. It's just a great movie.
image
@jayson
STAFF
Feb 13, 2025
recommendation image
🎥
The minute that Gene Hackman walks into the brothel in the 1992 Neo-Western Unforgiven, he's so casually evil that you want to spit phlegm at him to the screen from your couch. It's a particular role too, since the movie regards the previous iterations of Westerns as false. Unforgiven is about how all the outlaws of the past were no-good liars, that this is a no-good way of life. Clint Eastwood's William Munny is an alcoholic, wrestles with his pigs in the mud because he could no longer stand the pain from his exploits. But, it is Hackman --- who died in his Sante Fe home this Thursday morning -- who most understood the bleak vision that Eastwood is projecting to us. Sheriff Little Bill, his character in Unforgiven, was a keeper of sadism, a keeper of that bleakness that Eastwood conveys. Where the sheriffs of the myth that you read would be righteous veterans respected for their sincere integrity, or big defenders of justice, Little Bill is a gang in the way policemen are in didactic urban movies. When he needs to be empathetic, he is cavalier, letting the men who abuse the lovely prostitute in the beginning of the movie leave without any repercussions. When he is needs to be fair, he is sadistic; to him, vigilantes are one thing: villains here to take the shine away from him in his small-town that he runs for the sake of his ego. Hackman is shiveringly good as Little Bill; it's my favorite role from him in a career full of dynamic screen performances that have captured the rot of American life. You get the point that there is no point to any of what Bill is doing besides his own egocentrism. He finds vigilantes bad, not because it is amoral, but rather because they get the credit and not him. Popeye Doyle, for all of his tenacity, has a twisted sense of justice and what the police can do. The nastiness he conveys in his service of a conspiracy that goes beyond anything what Doyle can defeat -- yet, he can't help but continue the imperial march for his own ego. When you look at television cops like Jimmy McNulty or Vic Mackey, you see Hackman's portrayal of Doyle, and his Captain Ahab-like drive to be lower than the criminals he is chasing. I was nervous to write about Hackman, that's why I took so long to complete this blog. I didn't know what to write about, what performance to highlight, or how to start it. He's lived a monumental, complete life that brought a presence which changed the way audiences viewed actors. He wasn't a movie star in the way that Jimmy Stewart, Cary Grant, or even James Cagney was, but he was not a underrated character actor. Instead, his definition would be "a screen presence" --- a word used for an actor who is always the key component of the movie regardless of what his screen time is. He was both Popeye Doyle and the best of an ensemble cast, like he was in Wes Anderson's The Royal Tenebaums. He was great as Denzel's antagonist in Crimson Tide, as a ruthless meat boss in Prime Cut. Those roles suggested a brilliance that was unpretentious but intelligent. I would be remiss if I didn't bring up that performance as the Tenebaum family patriarch. His old man period was awesome -- he felt like a hired gun for a baseball team every free agency period, like he signed one year deals with every famous director on the planet --- and Royal Tenebaums is a prominent character in Anderson's filmography for his joy, irresponsibility, racism, unique humor, yet there is an underlying humanity that sets him apart from the other deadbeats. When Ben Stiller's Chas says "I've had a rough year, Dad." Hackman, in a line reading that is a caption for the wonders of friendship, empathy, and understanding says, "I know you have, Chassie." Cinema can really be unsettlingly pertinent, and that Hackman role is as good as a string part of a grilled cheese sandwich.
image
@jayson
STAFF
Feb 27, 2025