My full name is egregiously long and I always hated the way it looked in signatures so I shortened it and wrote it out probably like 50-100 times until I figured out what I wanted to do and how I wanted to stylize it
Jun 4, 2024

Comments (0)

Make an account to reply.

No comments yet

Related Recs

šŸ”
My last name is really long and often kind of unwieldy, if I call someone on the phone, itā€™s guaranteed they ask to spell it, so I drop the suffix and that makes things easier. That, and itā€™s my handle/name used for writing elsewhere.
Apr 4, 2024
šŸ“
like many Latine ppl, my full name consists of a myriad of last names from literally every blood-related family member that has ever graced this planet. although they're beautiful-sounding and i adore them all, they are quite frankly too long to use for username purposes. on top of that, it just doesn't feel right to butcher/frankenstein parts of them just to create a condensed username (perhaps iā€™ll change my mind on that aspect someday, but for now, iā€™m pretty steadfast about it). alas, verygoodvalentina was born... it uses my first name, it's easy to remember, feels like a pseudo-alliteration with the two Vs sandwiching the "good" together and can be said like a sentence, "very good, Valentina!" or as an entity, verygoodvalentinaā„¢ļø (VGV)
šŸ—’
it kind of sounds like a spell or like a distant european tongue or something when you say my full and middle names... i used to get bullied for my name but now I love it
Jun 12, 2024

Top Recs from @taterhole

recommendation image
šŸ§ø
My dad teases me about how when I was a little kid, my favorite thing to do when I was on the landline phone with somebodyā€”be it a relative or one of my best friendsā€”was to breathlessly describe the things that were in my bedroom so that they could have a mental picture of everything I loved and chose to surround myself with, and where I sat at that moment in time. Perfectly Imperfect reminds me of that so thanks for always listening and for sharing with me too šŸ’Œ
Feb 23, 2025
šŸ–
Iā€™ve been thinking about how much of social media is centered around curating our self-image. When selfies first became popular, they were dismissed as vain and vapidā€”a critique often rooted in misogynyā€”but now, the way we craft our online selves feels more like creating monuments. We try to signal our individuality, hoping to be seen and understood, but ironically, I think this widens the gap between how others perceive us and who we really are. Instead of fostering connection, it can invite projection and misinterpretationā€”preconceived notions, prefab labels, and stereotypes. Worse, individuality has become branded and commodified, reducing our identities to products for others to consume. On most platforms, validation often comes from how well you can curate and present your imageā€”selfies, aesthetic branding, and lifestyle content tend to dominate. High engagement is tied to visibility, not necessarily depth or substance. But I think spaces like PI.FYI show that thereā€™s another way: where connection is built on shared ideas, tastes, and interests rather than surface-level content. Itā€™s refreshing to be part of a community that values thoughts over optics. By sharing so few images of myself, Iā€™ve found that it gives others room to focus on my ideas and voice. When I do share an image, it feels intentionalā€”something that contributes to the story I want to tell rather than defining it. Sharing less allows me to express who I am beyond appearance. For women, especially, sharing less can be a radical act in a world where the default is to objectify ourselves. It resists the pressure to center appearance, focusing instead on what truly matters: our thoughts, voices, and authenticity. Iā€™ve posted a handful of pictures of myself in 2,500 posts because I care more about showing who I am than how I look. In trying to be seen, are we making it harder for others to truly know us? Itā€™s a question worth considering.
Dec 27, 2024